Conservative network Newsmax has been forced to “distance itself” from remarks uttered by host Rob Schmitt this week, who claimed that vaccines go "against nature" because diseases are "supposed to wipe out a certain amount of people,” and that vaccinations “unnaturally interfere with viruses' designs on killing people.”
Wow, kinda looks like the “Schmitt” has really hit the fan over at Newsmax. So, they want to “distance” themselves from Schmitt’s remarks, do they? Gee, makes you wonder if the morons who run Newsmax know they actually have the option not hire anti-science nitwits like Schmitt as anchors in the first place? Not to worry though, should Schmitt get fired, I'm sure folks like Kevin McCarthy or Rand Paul would warmly welcome him to become part of their staffs.
Of course, the truth is, what Schmitt is really promoting is “Social Darwinism.” Given that, I assume by the same logic he applies to vaccines, one may conclude that by warning people a tornado is approaching, we are interfering with the nature’s desire to wipe out all trailer parks. Or, those Trump supporters who’re refusing to get vaccinated, are actually assisting mother nature in its quest to cull the herd of those “hateful MAGA half-wits.”
Now, I’m certainly no medical expert, but it seems to me that by Schmitt’s definition, all modern medicine goes against nature - simply because its sole purpose is to fight disease. Therefore, after watching Schmitt’s Newsmax analysis on vaccinations, I suppose we’re left with one simple question - does modern medicine consider “stupidity” as a communicable disease?
Comments
Post a Comment