Skip to main content

Matt Gaetz Implies Pro-Choice Women Too Ugly to Get Pregnant


The Huffington Post reports Matt Gaetz (R-Fla) recently spoke at the ultra-conservative Turning Point USA’s Student Action Summit in Tampa, and got huge laughs and applause from the crowd when he asked “Why is it that the women with the least likelihood of getting pregnant are the ones most worried about having abortions?”  Gaetz further added that “Nobody wants to impregnate you if you look like a thumb.”  This isn’t the first time Gaetz has suggested pro-choice activists have trouble finding sexual partners.  In May, he tweeted "How many of the women rallying against overturning Roe are over-educated, under-loved millennials, who sadly return from protests to a lonely microwave dinner with their cats, and no bumble matches?”  

Well, I can see the Republican Party’s outreach to women voters is staying right on track this election cycle.  Of course, the truth is, you can take everything Matt Gaetz says about women’s appearances with a grain of salt, because when he tells you he only dates “10s," he's talking about their age - not their beauty.  That’s because Gaetz’s definition of “ugly,” is any female over fifteen.  In fact, his dating mantra is “if they’re old enough to drive - forget about it!”


So, let’s just put all logic aside, and simply pretend US Rep. Gaetz is correct in his analysis that “the only women who’d ever want an abortion, would be women who are way too ugly to find sex partners and get pregnant.”  OK Matt, if that’s true, then I guess you’d have no problem if we go ahead and repeal all those Draconian “anti-abortion laws” you Republicans have been passing, because obviously - no woman who’d want an abortion, will ever get pregnant.  Problem solved!


If you’ve enjoyed what you’ve just read, please consider joining me at:

Johnny Robish Comedy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Demands Constitution Be Set Aside and He Be Reinstated as President

Reacting to a Twitter post from Elon Musk who claimed Democrats violated the 1st Amendment by collaborating with big tech (Twitter), to remove tweets that featured pornographic photos of Hunter Biden during the 2020 election,” former President Donald Trump took to his Truth Social platform to demand that the United States Constitution be set aside and that he be reinstated as president.   Trump further claimed that "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.   Our great 'Founders' did not want, and would not condone False & Fraudulent Elections!” Now, let me get this straight, Trump wants the US Constitution to be suspended - because Twitter refused to publish photos of “Hunter Biden's junk” during that last presidential election?  The thing is Elon, Democrats weren’t even in power in 2020 - Trump was, which would make it a bit difficult for them to violate the...

Anti-Vax Newsmax Host Says Diseases are Supposed to Kill People

Conservative network Newsmax has been forced to “distance itself” from remarks uttered by host Rob Schmitt this week, who claimed that vaccines go "against nature" because diseases are "supposed to wipe out a certain amount of people,” and that vaccinations “unnaturally interfere with viruses' designs on killing people.” Wow, kinda looks like the “Schmitt” has really hit the fan over at Newsmax.  So, they want to “distance” themselves from Schmitt’s remarks, do they?  Gee, makes you wonder if the morons who run Newsmax know they actually have the option not hire anti-science nitwits like Schmitt as anchors in the first place?  Not to worry though, should Schmitt get fired, I'm sure folks like Kevin McCarthy or Rand Paul would warmly welcome him to become part of their staffs. Of course, the truth is, what Schmitt is really promoting is “Social Darwinism.”  Given that, I assume by the same logic he applies to vaccines, one may conclude that by warning people ...

2020 GOP Senate Nominee Claims the Equality Act Will ‘Illegalize’ Jesus Christ

The Equality Ac t is a bill before the United States Congress, that would simply prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federally funded programs, etc.   It doesn’t dictate what churches or religious people must believe, but that hasn’t stopped right-wing, QAnon, and flat Earth activist Lauren Witzke - the GOP’s failed 2020 Senate candidate from Delaware - from going on Alan Jones’ InfoWars and claiming that the bill will “illegalize Jesus Christ” and “categorize the Scripture as hate speech.” Well, given her stance on immigrants, I can’t imagine why she’d ever object to anyone “trying to illegalize Jesus Christ.”  I mean, by her standards - isn’t Jesus basically just another “illegal immigrant” from the Middle East?  So, what’s the problem?  Why, if you don’t believe me, then try telling some border patrol agent “but, but, I’m the son of God” - and see how far ...